Xiaomi Wins Domain Name Trademark Dispute, Gets Transfer of MI Trademark

Must Read

Babafemi Adebajo
Babafemi Adebajohttps://www.definitionsbyadebajo.com

Femi is a freelance content writer with adequate experience creating content for online and offline media across different niches including technology. When he is not writing, you can find him trying out new technology or reading.

On November 3, a court published its administrative judgment on the dispute between Xiaomi Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office.

The involved trademarks are a Xiaomi trademark No. 9927567 and an International Registration No. 1331842F “MI” trademark. The dispute was over a graphic trademark domain name initially registered by Xiaomi. Another organization re-registered the same graphic trademark name, but their registration was revoked in the litigations.

During the administrative ruling, the court discovered that the Xiaomi trademark No 9927567 hadn’t been used for three consecutive years.

Also Read

According to Chinese Trademark law, when a registered trademark is redundant (not in use) for three straight years, the Trademark Office could revoke the involved trademark or order its owner to rectify its non-usage.

Therefore, based on the Trademark regulations, the first cited “Xiaomi’ trademark was revoked after a second-instance litigation procedure. However, International Registration No. 1331842F “MI” trademark (second-mentioned trademark) has been assigned to the plaintiff (Xiaomi).

The court’s ruling is as follows:

  1. Revocation of the Trade Commentary [2020] No. 346743 “About No. 25990705 “Xiaomi xiaomi.com MI and Tu” trademark refusal to review the decision” issued by the defendant’s State Intellectual Property Office
  2. The State Intellectual Property Office of the defendant asks the defendant to make a new decision

The new decision the defendant has to make is based on a set of facts arrived at in the courts.

The New Facts

The court maintained the revocation of the first cited trademark, while the second cited trademark gets transferred to the plaintiff. Consequently, the appropriate barriers to registration of the disputed trademark have changed, and so the outcome of the court ruling shall change.

Accordingly, the court canceled the corresponding accusation. The defendant now has to re-examine the new realities and make a decision based on the new facts.

Stay updated

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss an update on the latest tech, gaming, startup, how to guide, deals and more.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Grow Your Business

Place your brand in front of tech-savvy audience. Partner with us to build brand awareness, increase website traffic, generate qualified leads, and grow your business.


- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -